MinT - Best Known (105−23, 105, s)-Nets in Base 25

Best Known (105−23, 105, s)-Nets in Base 25

(105−23, 105, 35578)-Net over F₂₅ — Constructive and digital

Digital (82, 105, 35578)-net over F₂₅, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (4, 15, 66)-net over F₂₅, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F₂₅, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅ with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
      - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]
2. digital (67, 90, 35512)-net over F₂₅, using
  - net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25⁹⁰, 35512, F₂₅, 23, 23) (dual of [(35512, 23), 816686, 24]-NRT-code), using
    - OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25⁹⁰, 390633, F₂₅, 23) (dual of [390633, 390543, 24]-code), using
      - discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25⁹⁰, 390635, F₂₅, 23) (dual of [390635, 390545, 24]-code), using
        constructionÂ X applied to C([0,11]) âŠ‚ C([0,10]) [i] based on
        linear OA(25⁸⁹, 390626, F₂₅, 23) (dual of [390626, 390537, 24]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 390626Â | 25⁸âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [0,11], and minimum distance dÂ â‰¥ |{−11,−10,…,11}|+1Â =Â 24 (BCH-bound) [i]
        linear OA(25⁸¹, 390626, F₂₅, 21) (dual of [390626, 390545, 22]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 390626Â | 25⁸âˆ’1, defining interval IÂ =Â [0,10], and minimum distance dÂ â‰¥ |{−10,−9,…,10}|+1Â =Â 22 (BCH-bound) [i]
        linear OA(25¹, 9, F₂₅, 1) (dual of [9, 8, 2]-code), using
        discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(25¹, s, F₂₅, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
        parity-check code [i]

(105−23, 105, 1772682)-Net over F₂₅ — Digital

Digital (82, 105, 1772682)-net over F₂₅, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(105−23, 105, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s

There is no (82, 105, large)-net in base 25, because

21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (82, 84, large)-net in base 25, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]

Best Known (105−23, 105, s)-Nets in Base 25

(105−23, 105, 35578)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital

(105−23, 105, 1772682)-Net over F25 — Digital

(105−23, 105, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s

(105−23, 105, 35578)-Net over F₂₅ — Constructive and digital

(105−23, 105, 1772682)-Net over F₂₅ — Digital