Best Known (108−25, 108, s)-Nets in Base 25
(108−25, 108, 32577)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (83, 108, 32577)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 12, 26)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 25)-sequence over F25, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 26, using
- the rational function field F25(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 25)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (71, 96, 32551)-net over F25, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2596, 32551, F25, 25, 25) (dual of [(32551, 25), 813679, 26]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2596, 390613, F25, 25) (dual of [390613, 390517, 26]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2596, 390624, F25, 25) (dual of [390624, 390528, 26]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2597, 390625, F25, 26) (dual of [390625, 390528, 27]-code), using
- an extension Ce(25) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 390624 = 254−1, defining interval I = [1,25], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2597, 390625, F25, 26) (dual of [390625, 390528, 27]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2596, 390624, F25, 25) (dual of [390624, 390528, 26]-code), using
- OOA 12-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2596, 390613, F25, 25) (dual of [390613, 390517, 26]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2596, 32551, F25, 25, 25) (dual of [(32551, 25), 813679, 26]-NRT-code), using
- digital (0, 12, 26)-net over F25, using
(108−25, 108, 797789)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (83, 108, 797789)-net over F25, using
(108−25, 108, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (83, 108, large)-net in base 25, because
- 23 times m-reduction [i] would yield (83, 85, large)-net in base 25, but