Best Known (89−35, 89, s)-Nets in Base 25
(89−35, 89, 326)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 89, 326)-net over F25, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (54, 92, 326)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 29, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (25, 63, 200)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 199)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 199)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (10, 29, 126)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(89−35, 89, 2591)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (54, 89, 2591)-net over F25, using
(89−35, 89, 5153811)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 89, 5153812)-net in base 25, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 88, 5153812)-net in base 25, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 25m ≥ 1044 048801 678736 240798 106101 974242 410738 599729 969877 051933 118162 804649 444682 243858 997554 736425 163865 110196 490542 951805 715425 > 2588 [i]