Best Known (105−42, 105, s)-Nets in Base 25
(105−42, 105, 334)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (63, 105, 334)-net over F25, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (63, 106, 334)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 23, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (9, 30, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- digital (10, 53, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (9, 23, 104)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(105−42, 105, 2578)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (63, 105, 2578)-net over F25, using
(105−42, 105, 3531669)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (63, 105, 3531670)-net in base 25, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 25m ≥ 607 718823 969972 606087 539422 122943 557323 640393 314636 314927 199162 868107 080500 116109 125320 180839 458881 560100 808446 995163 065222 555339 930662 441872 123345 > 25105 [i]