Best Known (64, 64+42, s)-Nets in Base 25
(64, 64+42, 356)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (64, 106, 356)-net over F25, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (64, 107, 356)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 23, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (10, 31, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (10, 53, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- digital (9, 23, 104)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(64, 64+42, 2787)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (64, 106, 2787)-net over F25, using
(64, 64+42, 4116695)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (64, 106, 4116696)-net in base 25, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 25m ≥ 15192 911323 535682 956938 837051 669884 905147 668529 527831 424988 749563 452485 949806 457345 910466 182509 300541 677609 226735 326339 987507 310815 606922 572248 764225 > 25106 [i]