MinT - Best Known (67, 104, s)-Nets in Base 25

Best Known (67, 104, s)-Nets in Base 25

(67, 104, 392)-Net over F₂₅ — Constructive and digital

Digital (67, 104, 392)-net over F₂₅, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (67, 105, 392)-net over F₂₅, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (23, 42, 192)-net over F₂₅, using
    - (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
      1. digital (4, 13, 66)-net over F₂₅, using
        net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 65)-sequence over F₂₅, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅ with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]
      2. digital (10, 29, 126)-net over F₂₅, using
        net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F₂₅, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅ with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
        the Hermitian function field over F₂₅ [i]
  2. digital (25, 63, 200)-net over F₂₅, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 199)-sequence over F₂₅, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₅ with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 200, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(67, 104, 6520)-Net over F₂₅ — Digital

Digital (67, 104, 6520)-net over F₂₅, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(67, 104, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s

There is no (67, 104, large)-net in base 25, because

35 times m-reduction [i] would yield (67, 69, large)-net in base 25, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]