Best Known (57, 80, s)-Nets in Base 25
(57, 80, 1448)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 80, 1448)-net over F25, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 13, 28)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 27)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (44, 67, 1420)-net over F25, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2567, 1420, F25, 23, 23) (dual of [(1420, 23), 32593, 24]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2567, 15621, F25, 23) (dual of [15621, 15554, 24]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2567, 15625, F25, 23) (dual of [15625, 15558, 24]-code), using
- an extension Ce(22) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 15624 = 253−1, defining interval I = [1,22], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 23 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2567, 15625, F25, 23) (dual of [15625, 15558, 24]-code), using
- OOA 11-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2567, 15621, F25, 23) (dual of [15621, 15554, 24]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2567, 1420, F25, 23, 23) (dual of [(1420, 23), 32593, 24]-NRT-code), using
- digital (2, 13, 28)-net over F25, using
(57, 80, 45726)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (57, 80, 45726)-net over F25, using
(57, 80, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 80, large)-net in base 25, because
- 21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 59, large)-net in base 25, but