Best Known (57, 91, s)-Nets in Base 25
(57, 91, 356)-Net over F25 — Constructive and digital
Digital (57, 91, 356)-net over F25, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (57, 92, 356)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 20, 104)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (10, 27, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- the Hermitian function field over F25 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F25 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 126, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25, using
- digital (10, 45, 126)-net over F25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 125)-sequence over F25 (see above)
- digital (9, 20, 104)-net over F25, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(57, 91, 3944)-Net over F25 — Digital
Digital (57, 91, 3944)-net over F25, using
(57, 91, large)-Net in Base 25 — Upper bound on s
There is no (57, 91, large)-net in base 25, because
- 32 times m-reduction [i] would yield (57, 59, large)-net in base 25, but