Best Known (17−11, 17, s)-Nets in Base 256
(17−11, 17, 515)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (6, 17, 515)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 5, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 12, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (0, 5, 257)-net over F256, using
(17−11, 17, 546)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (6, 17, 546)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25617, 546, F256, 3, 11) (dual of [(546, 3), 1621, 12]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(2565, 257, F256, 3, 5) (dual of [(257, 3), 766, 6]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(3;766,256) [i]
- linear OOA(25612, 289, F256, 3, 11) (dual of [(289, 3), 855, 12]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,855P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(2565, 257, F256, 3, 5) (dual of [(257, 3), 766, 6]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(17−11, 17, 519591)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (6, 17, 519592)-net in base 256, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (6, 16, 519592)-net in base 256, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 340 283095 752478 887489 893638 475947 348051 > 25616 [i]