Best Known (37−23, 37, s)-Nets in Base 256
(37−23, 37, 517)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (14, 37, 517)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 12, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (2, 25, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 12, 258)-net over F256, using
(37−23, 37, 610)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (14, 37, 610)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25637, 610, F256, 3, 23) (dual of [(610, 3), 1793, 24]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(25612, 289, F256, 3, 11) (dual of [(289, 3), 855, 12]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,855P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(25625, 321, F256, 3, 23) (dual of [(321, 3), 938, 24]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,939P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- linear OOA(25612, 289, F256, 3, 11) (dual of [(289, 3), 855, 12]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(37−23, 37, 1465497)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (14, 37, 1465498)-net in base 256, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (14, 36, 1465498)-net in base 256, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 497 324938 112065 657084 349088 576222 401210 901455 329060 845895 244988 160735 944906 755808 267016 > 25636 [i]