Best Known (57−33, 57, s)-Nets in Base 256
(57−33, 57, 522)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 57, 522)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 20, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (4, 37, 261)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 260)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (4, 20, 261)-net over F256, using
(57−33, 57, 1025)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (24, 57, 1025)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 1024)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- K1,2 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
(57−33, 57, 7158762)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 57, 7158763)-net in base 256, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 56, 7158763)-net in base 256, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 726 839281 682463 472770 681731 308566 785797 998532 086875 688997 467107 821997 756801 409646 926031 756947 348758 377694 639434 075957 859460 242887 329166 > 25656 [i]