Best Known (26, 26+41, s)-Nets in Base 256
(26, 26+41, 520)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 67, 520)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 23, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (3, 44, 260)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 259)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (3, 23, 260)-net over F256, using
(26, 26+41, 1025)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (26, 67, 1025)-net over F256, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 67, 1025)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 1024)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- K1,2 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 1024)-sequence over F256, using
(26, 26+41, 2883742)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 67, 2883743)-net in base 256, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 66, 2883743)-net in base 256, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 878 696524 470068 280125 247686 624925 873601 371899 338369 416156 487305 785092 497059 023687 907122 010993 078512 138382 261760 068871 086102 582098 270789 548788 051905 962422 351551 > 25666 [i]