Best Known (7, 20, s)-Nets in Base 256
(7, 20, 515)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (7, 20, 515)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 6, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 14, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (0, 6, 257)-net over F256, using
(7, 20, 546)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (7, 20, 546)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25620, 546, F256, 3, 13) (dual of [(546, 3), 1618, 14]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(2566, 257, F256, 3, 6) (dual of [(257, 3), 765, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(3;765,256) [i]
- linear OOA(25614, 289, F256, 3, 13) (dual of [(289, 3), 853, 14]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,853P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(2566, 257, F256, 3, 6) (dual of [(257, 3), 765, 7]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(7, 20, 496332)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (7, 20, 496333)-net in base 256, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (7, 19, 496333)-net in base 256, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 5709 009200 821160 061230 269911 768002 868460 181116 > 25619 [i]