Best Known (10, 28, s)-Nets in Base 256
(10, 28, 515)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (10, 28, 515)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 9, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 19, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (0, 9, 257)-net over F256, using
(10, 28, 546)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (10, 28, 546)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25628, 546, F256, 4, 18) (dual of [(546, 4), 2156, 19]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(2569, 257, F256, 4, 9) (dual of [(257, 4), 1019, 10]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(4;1019,256) [i]
- linear OOA(25619, 289, F256, 4, 18) (dual of [(289, 4), 1137, 19]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(4;F,1137P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(2569, 257, F256, 4, 9) (dual of [(257, 4), 1019, 10]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(10, 28, 505254)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (10, 28, 505255)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 26 960341 420696 499919 310274 445174 000802 440001 217674 717819 227143 559976 > 25628 [i]