Best Known (12, 32, s)-Nets in Base 256
(12, 32, 516)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (12, 32, 516)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 11, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 21, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (1, 11, 258)-net over F256, using
(12, 32, 578)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (12, 32, 578)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25632, 578, F256, 3, 20) (dual of [(578, 3), 1702, 21]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(25611, 289, F256, 3, 10) (dual of [(289, 3), 856, 11]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,856P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(25621, 289, F256, 3, 20) (dual of [(289, 3), 846, 21]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,846P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289 (see above)
- linear OOA(25611, 289, F256, 3, 10) (dual of [(289, 3), 856, 11]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(12, 32, 903237)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (12, 32, 903238)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 115793 078747 429530 183513 817443 037494 427735 274096 961377 156475 518040 258956 521776 > 25632 [i]