Best Known (12, 35, s)-Nets in Base 256
(12, 35, 515)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (12, 35, 515)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 24, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (0, 11, 257)-net over F256, using
(12, 35, 546)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (12, 35, 546)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25635, 546, F256, 6, 23) (dual of [(546, 6), 3241, 24]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(25611, 257, F256, 6, 11) (dual of [(257, 6), 1531, 12]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(6;1531,256) [i]
- linear OOA(25624, 289, F256, 6, 23) (dual of [(289, 6), 1710, 24]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(6;F,1710P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(25611, 257, F256, 6, 11) (dual of [(257, 6), 1531, 12]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(12, 35, 534712)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (12, 35, 534713)-net in base 256, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (12, 34, 534713)-net in base 256, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 7588 562129 657279 668909 004196 006701 591458 245281 296661 843442 165982 812866 907811 123216 > 25634 [i]