Best Known (14, 36, s)-Nets in Base 256
(14, 36, 517)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (14, 36, 517)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 12, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (2, 24, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 12, 258)-net over F256, using
(14, 36, 610)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (14, 36, 610)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25636, 610, F256, 2, 22) (dual of [(610, 2), 1184, 23]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(25612, 289, F256, 2, 11) (dual of [(289, 2), 566, 12]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,566P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(25624, 321, F256, 2, 22) (dual of [(321, 2), 618, 23]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,619P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- linear OOA(25612, 289, F256, 2, 11) (dual of [(289, 2), 566, 12]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(14, 36, 1465497)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (14, 36, 1465498)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 497 324938 112065 657084 349088 576222 401210 901455 329060 845895 244988 160735 944906 755808 267016 > 25636 [i]