Best Known (26, 43, s)-Nets in Base 256
(26, 43, 8451)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 43, 8451)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 10, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (16, 33, 8192)-net over F256, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25633, 8192, F256, 17, 17) (dual of [(8192, 17), 139231, 18]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25633, 65537, F256, 17) (dual of [65537, 65504, 18]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 65537 | 2564−1, defining interval I = [0,8], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−8,−7,…,8}|+1 = 18 (BCH-bound) [i]
- OOA 8-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(25633, 65537, F256, 17) (dual of [65537, 65504, 18]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(25633, 8192, F256, 17, 17) (dual of [(8192, 17), 139231, 18]-NRT-code), using
- digital (2, 10, 259)-net over F256, using
(26, 43, 79102)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (26, 43, 79102)-net over F256, using
(26, 43, large)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 43, large)-net in base 256, because
- 15 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 28, large)-net in base 256, but