Best Known (17, 45, s)-Nets in Base 256
(17, 45, 517)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (17, 45, 517)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 15, 258)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 257)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (2, 30, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (1, 15, 258)-net over F256, using
(17, 45, 610)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (17, 45, 610)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25645, 610, F256, 3, 28) (dual of [(610, 3), 1785, 29]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(25615, 289, F256, 3, 14) (dual of [(289, 3), 852, 15]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,852P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 289, using
- linear OOA(25630, 321, F256, 3, 28) (dual of [(321, 3), 933, 29]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(3;F,934P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- linear OOA(25615, 289, F256, 3, 14) (dual of [(289, 3), 852, 15]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(17, 45, 1305228)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (17, 45, 1305229)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 2 348544 057432 387454 172704 174962 714174 580307 374235 363792 891869 768411 902322 788472 721099 528982 815277 111458 414656 > 25645 [i]