Best Known (19, 49, s)-Nets in Base 256
(19, 49, 518)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (19, 49, 518)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 17, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (2, 32, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (2, 17, 259)-net over F256, using
(19, 49, 642)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (19, 49, 642)-net over F256, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(25649, 642, F256, 2, 30) (dual of [(642, 2), 1235, 31]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(25617, 321, F256, 2, 15) (dual of [(321, 2), 625, 16]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,626P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321, using
- linear OOA(25632, 321, F256, 2, 30) (dual of [(321, 2), 610, 31]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,611P) [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 321 (see above)
- linear OOA(25617, 321, F256, 2, 15) (dual of [(321, 2), 625, 16]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(19, 49, 1854137)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (19, 49, 1854138)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 10086 923267 505174 628944 451875 003938 376256 454444 922793 246899 790001 445512 099881 585232 674470 510715 433017 887767 978260 797976 > 25649 [i]