Best Known (25, 67, s)-Nets in Base 256
(25, 67, 518)-Net over F256 — Constructive and digital
Digital (25, 67, 518)-net over F256, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 23, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256, using
- digital (2, 44, 259)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 258)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- digital (2, 23, 259)-net over F256, using
(25, 67, 1025)-Net over F256 — Digital
Digital (25, 67, 1025)-net over F256, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 67, 1025)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 1024)-sequence over F256, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- K1,2 from the tower of function fields by Niederreiter and Xing based on the tower by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F256 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 1025, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 1024)-sequence over F256, using
(25, 67, 1642033)-Net in Base 256 — Upper bound on s
There is no (25, 67, 1642034)-net in base 256, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 224947 375139 525549 951029 091734 189702 758088 007401 365831 333477 542204 084866 797139 974660 358342 231747 715473 490345 263595 614961 714282 988612 498522 033700 685531 447560 312696 > 25667 [i]