Best Known (9, 9+17, s)-Nets in Base 27
(9, 9+17, 88)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 26, 88)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
(9, 9+17, 99)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (9, 26, 99)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 98)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 99, using
(9, 9+17, 116)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(9, 26, 116)-net in base 27, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 28, 116)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 116)-net over F81, using
(9, 9+17, 118)-Net in Base 27
(9, 26, 118)-net in base 27, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (9, 28, 118)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 21, 118)-net over F81, using
(9, 9+17, 4298)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 26, 4299)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 25, 4299)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 608528 676444 166629 854808 639248 407473 > 2725 [i]