Best Known (51, 51+27, s)-Nets in Base 27
(51, 51+27, 1513)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 78, 1513)-net over F27, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2778, 1513, F27, 27, 27) (dual of [(1513, 27), 40773, 28]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 13-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2778, 19670, F27, 27) (dual of [19670, 19592, 28]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2778, 19682, F27, 27) (dual of [19682, 19604, 28]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2779, 19683, F27, 28) (dual of [19683, 19604, 29]-code), using
- an extension Ce(27) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 19682 = 273−1, defining interval I = [1,27], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2779, 19683, F27, 28) (dual of [19683, 19604, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2778, 19682, F27, 27) (dual of [19682, 19604, 28]-code), using
- OOA 13-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2778, 19670, F27, 27) (dual of [19670, 19592, 28]-code), using
(51, 51+27, 10016)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (51, 78, 10016)-net over F27, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(2778, 10016, F27, 27) (dual of [10016, 9938, 28]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2778, 19682, F27, 27) (dual of [19682, 19604, 28]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2779, 19683, F27, 28) (dual of [19683, 19604, 29]-code), using
- an extension Ce(27) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 19682 = 273−1, defining interval I = [1,27], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 28 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(2779, 19683, F27, 28) (dual of [19683, 19604, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2778, 19682, F27, 27) (dual of [19682, 19604, 28]-code), using
(51, 51+27, large)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 78, large)-net in base 27, because
- 25 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 53, large)-net in base 27, but