MinT - Best Known (95−35, 95, s)-Nets in Base 27

Best Known (95−35, 95, s)-Nets in Base 27

(95−35, 95, 304)-Net over F₂₇ — Constructive and digital

Digital (60, 95, 304)-net over F₂₇, using

generalized (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (6, 14, 76)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F₂₇, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
2. digital (6, 17, 76)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F₂₇ (see above)
3. digital (6, 23, 76)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F₂₇ (see above)
4. digital (6, 41, 76)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F₂₇ (see above)

(95−35, 95, 730)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive

(60, 95, 730)-net in base 27, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on (60, 96, 730)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (36, 72, 730)-net over F₈₁, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 729)-sequence over F₈₁, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 730, using
      - the Hermitian function field over F₈₁ [i]

(95−35, 95, 5216)-Net over F₂₇ — Digital

Digital (60, 95, 5216)-net over F₂₇, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(95−35, 95, large)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s

There is no (60, 95, large)-net in base 27, because

33 times m-reduction [i] would yield (60, 62, large)-net in base 27, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]