Best Known (90−38, 90, s)-Nets in Base 27
(90−38, 90, 246)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (52, 90, 246)-net over F27, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 19, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (7, 26, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (7, 45, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (7, 19, 82)-net over F27, using
(90−38, 90, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(52, 90, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 90, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
(90−38, 90, 1727)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (52, 90, 1727)-net over F27, using
(90−38, 90, 1838162)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (52, 90, 1838163)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 664 873544 403270 269037 951109 663579 167148 283894 672712 789475 817587 611189 711712 653226 817546 915782 025469 684202 042412 516881 296568 698147 > 2790 [i]