Best Known (98−47, 98, s)-Nets in Base 27
(98−47, 98, 202)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 98, 202)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 33, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (18, 65, 108)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 107)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 108, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra, GarcÃa, and Stichtenoth over F27 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 108, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 107)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (10, 33, 94)-net over F27, using
(98−47, 98, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(51, 98, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 98, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
(98−47, 98, 804)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (51, 98, 804)-net over F27, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(2798, 804, F27, 47) (dual of [804, 706, 48]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2798, 807, F27, 47) (dual of [807, 709, 48]-code), using
- 67 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 34 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(2790, 732, F27, 47) (dual of [732, 642, 48]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([727,44]), C2 = C([0,45]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,44]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([727,45]) [i] based on
- linear OA(2788, 728, F27, 46) (dual of [728, 640, 47]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 272−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,44}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 47 [i]
- linear OA(2788, 728, F27, 46) (dual of [728, 640, 47]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 272−1, defining interval I = [0,45], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 47 [i]
- linear OA(2790, 728, F27, 47) (dual of [728, 638, 48]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 272−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,45}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 48 [i]
- linear OA(2786, 728, F27, 45) (dual of [728, 642, 46]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 272−1, defining interval I = [0,44], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 46 [i]
- linear OA(270, 2, F27, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(270, s, F27, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(270, 2, F27, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([727,44]), C2 = C([0,45]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,44]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([727,45]) [i] based on
- 67 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (4, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 34 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(2790, 732, F27, 47) (dual of [732, 642, 48]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2798, 807, F27, 47) (dual of [807, 709, 48]-code), using
(98−47, 98, 394539)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 98, 394540)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 97, 394540)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 6 954843 835986 382691 056502 637087 017333 226707 505228 835158 101990 277043 014097 381638 861324 113315 155196 317033 288127 375113 799180 486488 339297 774449 > 2797 [i]