Best Known (47, 47+55, s)-Nets in Base 27
(47, 47+55, 188)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 102, 188)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 37, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (10, 65, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (10, 37, 94)-net over F27, using
(47, 47+55, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(47, 102, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 102, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
(47, 47+55, 401)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (47, 102, 401)-net over F27, using
(47, 47+55, 95001)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 102, 95002)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 101, 95002)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 3 696701 355195 260235 658822 068964 647012 336714 309170 423679 764505 279059 373534 028587 438186 157431 414647 756195 934532 144512 830787 962545 218058 963201 876081 > 27101 [i]