Best Known (104−56, 104, s)-Nets in Base 27
(104−56, 104, 188)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 104, 188)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 38, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (10, 66, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (10, 38, 94)-net over F27, using
(104−56, 104, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(48, 104, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 104, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
(104−56, 104, 411)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (48, 104, 411)-net over F27, using
(104−56, 104, 90044)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 104, 90045)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 72769 621713 321247 721429 078911 020019 070863 177058 883028 771881 400923 674141 389764 099983 094182 811185 092673 611581 872511 710166 143666 175716 241150 552852 512273 > 27104 [i]