Best Known (50, 50+58, s)-Nets in Base 27
(50, 50+58, 190)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (50, 108, 190)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 39, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (11, 69, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (10, 39, 94)-net over F27, using
(50, 50+58, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(50, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
(50, 50+58, 430)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (50, 108, 430)-net over F27, using
(50, 50+58, 96089)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (50, 108, 96090)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 38666 675223 060580 301728 024515 582782 912676 177884 490114 329590 301988 083755 830507 123341 183558 554111 860224 403702 775090 272088 543256 959089 263041 275154 872761 837325 > 27108 [i]