Best Known (29, 29+72, s)-Nets in Base 27
(29, 29+72, 114)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 101, 114)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 101, 114)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
(29, 29+72, 116)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(29, 101, 116)-net in base 27, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 108, 116)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 81, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 81, 116)-net over F81, using
(29, 29+72, 208)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (29, 101, 208)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 101, 208)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
(29, 29+72, 5676)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 101, 5677)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 3 703990 479846 053491 376749 861452 837707 489273 948310 865137 849758 046431 623657 700050 219154 759707 410043 398194 262281 438860 170026 553880 110062 903676 005553 > 27101 [i]