Best Known (30, 109, s)-Nets in Base 27
(30, 109, 114)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 109, 114)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 109, 114)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
(30, 109, 116)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(30, 109, 116)-net in base 27, using
- 271 times duplication [i] based on (29, 108, 116)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 81, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (2, 81, 116)-net over F81, using
(30, 109, 208)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (30, 109, 208)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 109, 208)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
(30, 109, 5427)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 109, 5428)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 108, 5428)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 38826 099915 067751 791918 004415 724263 949542 100164 823023 423077 630638 917092 206578 869814 447492 087808 129096 190400 619610 360237 188673 867973 529473 398533 913362 127889 > 27108 [i]