Best Known (9, 32, s)-Nets in Base 27
(9, 32, 88)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 32, 88)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 87)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 88, using
(9, 32, 99)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (9, 32, 99)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 98)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 99, using
(9, 32, 100)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(9, 32, 100)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 24, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
(9, 32, 2035)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 32, 2036)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 31, 2036)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 235 942448 666227 634230 551485 288055 309726 826641 > 2731 [i]