Best Known (36, 52, s)-Nets in Base 27
(36, 52, 2463)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 52, 2463)-net over F27, using
- 271 times duplication [i] based on digital (35, 51, 2463)-net over F27, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2751, 2463, F27, 16, 16) (dual of [(2463, 16), 39357, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2751, 19704, F27, 16) (dual of [19704, 19653, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2751, 19706, F27, 16) (dual of [19706, 19655, 17]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(9) [i] based on
- linear OA(2746, 19683, F27, 16) (dual of [19683, 19637, 17]-code), using an extension Ce(15) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 19682 = 273−1, defining interval I = [1,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 16 [i]
- linear OA(2728, 19683, F27, 10) (dual of [19683, 19655, 11]-code), using an extension Ce(9) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 19682 = 273−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- linear OA(275, 23, F27, 5) (dual of [23, 18, 6]-code or 23-arc in PG(4,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(275, 27, F27, 5) (dual of [27, 22, 6]-code or 27-arc in PG(4,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(22,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(275, 27, F27, 5) (dual of [27, 22, 6]-code or 27-arc in PG(4,27)), using
- construction X applied to Ce(15) ⊂ Ce(9) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2751, 19706, F27, 16) (dual of [19706, 19655, 17]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(2751, 19704, F27, 16) (dual of [19704, 19653, 17]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2751, 2463, F27, 16, 16) (dual of [(2463, 16), 39357, 17]-NRT-code), using
(36, 52, 22646)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (36, 52, 22646)-net over F27, using
(36, 52, large)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 52, large)-net in base 27, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 38, large)-net in base 27, but