Best Known (15, 54, s)-Nets in Base 27
(15, 54, 96)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (15, 54, 96)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 54, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
(15, 54, 100)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(15, 54, 100)-net in base 27, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (15, 56, 100)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 42, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (1, 42, 100)-net over F81, using
(15, 54, 136)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (15, 54, 136)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (13, 54, 136)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 135)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 135)-sequence over F27, using
(15, 54, 2989)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (15, 54, 2990)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (15, 53, 2990)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 7310 418897 165180 681802 198012 538914 106610 735740 579312 055845 912521 906267 453553 > 2753 [i]