Best Known (29, 64, s)-Nets in Base 27
(29, 64, 152)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 64, 152)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 23, 76)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (6, 41, 76)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 75)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (6, 23, 76)-net over F27, using
(29, 64, 224)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(29, 64, 224)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (13, 48, 224)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 224, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
(29, 64, 260)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (29, 64, 260)-net over F27, using
(29, 64, 298)-Net in Base 27
(29, 64, 298)-net in base 27, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 68, 298)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (12, 51, 298)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 297)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 298, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 297)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (12, 51, 298)-net over F81, using
(29, 64, 55637)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 64, 55638)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 63, 55638)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 1 499485 544481 082628 390987 977838 885690 185177 342060 401416 730180 489078 893274 894264 937435 720349 > 2763 [i]