Best Known (51, 66, s)-Nets in Base 27
(51, 66, 75968)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 66, 75968)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 9, 48)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 47)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 47)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (42, 57, 75920)-net over F27, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2757, 75920, F27, 15, 15) (dual of [(75920, 15), 1138743, 16]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2757, 531441, F27, 15) (dual of [531441, 531384, 16]-code), using
- an extension Ce(14) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 531440 = 274−1, defining interval I = [1,14], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 15 [i]
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(2757, 531441, F27, 15) (dual of [531441, 531384, 16]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2757, 75920, F27, 15, 15) (dual of [(75920, 15), 1138743, 16]-NRT-code), using
- digital (2, 9, 48)-net over F27, using
(51, 66, 1301201)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (51, 66, 1301201)-net over F27, using
(51, 66, large)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 66, large)-net in base 27, because
- 13 times m-reduction [i] would yield (51, 53, large)-net in base 27, but