Best Known (32, 69, s)-Nets in Base 27
(32, 69, 164)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 69, 164)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 25, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (7, 44, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (7, 25, 82)-net over F27, using
(32, 69, 224)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(32, 69, 224)-net in base 27, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on (32, 76, 224)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (13, 57, 224)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 224, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 223)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (13, 57, 224)-net over F81, using
(32, 69, 309)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (32, 69, 309)-net over F27, using
(32, 69, 74212)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 69, 74213)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (32, 68, 74213)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 21 517272 475321 181721 734235 062368 934522 899981 731405 585844 081942 805615 006499 303917 067413 427389 584929 > 2768 [i]