Best Known (29, 88, s)-Nets in Base 27
(29, 88, 114)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 88, 114)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 88, 114)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
(29, 88, 172)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(29, 88, 172)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 66, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
(29, 88, 208)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (29, 88, 208)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 88, 208)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
(29, 88, 8820)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 88, 8821)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 87, 8821)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 33826 727533 134008 595258 468683 363810 845622 867644 106046 247826 734787 454471 992840 515431 888769 526526 834682 912242 868259 254441 506099 > 2787 [i]