Best Known (45, 91, s)-Nets in Base 27
(45, 91, 192)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 91, 192)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 34, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (11, 57, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (11, 34, 96)-net over F27, using
(45, 91, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(45, 91, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 91, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
(45, 91, 543)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (45, 91, 543)-net over F27, using
(45, 91, 166983)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 91, 166984)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 17952 512723 127602 360015 595873 365654 323270 301418 301966 772492 455407 878832 166802 158045 571411 029191 121490 787806 840201 479108 670283 653409 > 2791 [i]