Best Known (30, 95, s)-Nets in Base 27
(30, 95, 114)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 95, 114)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 95, 114)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
(30, 95, 160)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(30, 95, 160)-net in base 27, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (30, 100, 160)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 75, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 75, 160)-net over F81, using
(30, 95, 208)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (30, 95, 208)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 95, 208)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
(30, 95, 7863)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 95, 7864)-net in base 27, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 94, 7864)-net in base 27, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 354 070000 031756 128051 441561 342510 178754 606501 300055 192889 935752 760831 373498 576648 940828 572347 246925 173464 161385 598847 120367 009479 690241 > 2794 [i]