Best Known (48, 96, s)-Nets in Base 27
(48, 96, 192)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 96, 192)-net over F27, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (48, 100, 192)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 37, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27, using
- digital (11, 63, 96)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 95)-sequence over F27 (see above)
- digital (11, 37, 96)-net over F27, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(48, 96, 370)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(48, 96, 370)-net in base 27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (43, 96, 370)-net in base 27, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (16, 81, 370)-net over F81, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on (43, 108, 370)-net in base 27, using
(48, 96, 605)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (48, 96, 605)-net over F27, using
(48, 96, 200362)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 96, 200363)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 257585 568908 840140 935419 958898 687179 339449 529416 393113 302946 403302 686777 336034 830848 643379 771395 163521 778507 588248 895337 766361 865875 331601 > 2796 [i]