Best Known (32, 98, s)-Nets in Base 27
(32, 98, 114)-Net over F27 — Constructive and digital
Digital (32, 98, 114)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 98, 114)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 114, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 113)-sequence over F27, using
(32, 98, 172)-Net in Base 27 — Constructive
(32, 98, 172)-net in base 27, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on (32, 100, 172)-net in base 27, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 75, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 75, 172)-net over F81, using
(32, 98, 208)-Net over F27 — Digital
Digital (32, 98, 208)-net over F27, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (24, 98, 208)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 24 and N(F) ≥ 208, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (24, 207)-sequence over F27, using
(32, 98, 9000)-Net in Base 27 — Upper bound on s
There is no (32, 98, 9001)-net in base 27, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 188 143224 244201 060330 558153 478486 186813 858003 154112 634061 631327 937736 062256 387746 465251 182989 175781 701536 348085 707735 540701 131922 564984 890027 > 2798 [i]