Best Known (198−104, 198, s)-Nets in Base 3
(198−104, 198, 65)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (94, 198, 65)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 67, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (27, 131, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (15, 67, 28)-net over F3, using
(198−104, 198, 96)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (94, 198, 96)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (89, 198, 96)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 89 and N(F) ≥ 96, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (89, 95)-sequence over F3, using
(198−104, 198, 613)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (94, 198, 614)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 31356 531179 120504 741164 290227 425539 728865 977864 274050 254022 846128 289609 160382 807713 788312 084457 > 3198 [i]