Best Known (126−106, 126, s)-Nets in Base 3
(126−106, 126, 28)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 126, 28)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (15, 126, 28)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 27)-sequence over F3, using
(126−106, 126, 32)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (20, 126, 32)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (19, 126, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 31)-sequence over F3, using
(126−106, 126, 54)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 126, 55)-net in base 3, because
- 21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 105, 55)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3105, 55, S3, 2, 85), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 6762 783827 045452 685860 442944 784482 340397 054903 697122 / 43 > 3105 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3105, 55, S3, 2, 85), but