Best Known (106, 106+109, s)-Nets in Base 3
(106, 106+109, 73)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (106, 215, 73)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (106, 72)-sequence over F3, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 72)-sequence over F9, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- s-reduction based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- base reduction for sequences [i] based on digital (17, 72)-sequence over F9, using
(106, 106+109, 104)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (106, 215, 104)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (102, 215, 104)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 102 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (102, 103)-sequence over F3, using
(106, 106+109, 763)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (106, 215, 764)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (106, 214, 764)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 336948 308657 425114 373609 397644 487890 007166 762728 093603 469032 440972 230462 547221 884303 749703 725084 463017 > 3214 [i]