Best Known (51, 51+110, s)-Nets in Base 3
(51, 51+110, 48)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (51, 161, 48)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (45, 161, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
(51, 51+110, 64)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (51, 161, 64)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 161, 64)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 63)-sequence over F3, using
(51, 51+110, 162)-Net over F3 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (51, 161, 163)-net over F3, because
- 2 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (51, 159, 163)-net over F3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(3159, 163, F3, 108) (dual of [163, 4, 109]-code), but
(51, 51+110, 215)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (51, 161, 216)-net in base 3, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 70654 193378 741539 399703 167073 571047 367404 560459 081949 227532 295684 437433 795873 > 3161 [i]