Best Known (233−111, 233, s)-Nets in Base 3
(233−111, 233, 80)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (122, 233, 80)-net over F3, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (122, 234, 80)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 77, 32)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 31)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (45, 157, 48)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 45 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 47)-sequence over F3, using
- digital (21, 77, 32)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(233−111, 233, 131)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (122, 233, 131)-net over F3, using
(233−111, 233, 1044)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (122, 233, 1045)-net in base 3, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (122, 232, 1045)-net in base 3, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 495 279369 871829 867998 941984 158785 319695 541863 334301 253536 975019 312984 019297 536976 048830 555520 826685 921956 019419 > 3232 [i]