Best Known (159−116, 159, s)-Nets in Base 3
(159−116, 159, 42)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 159, 42)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 159, 42)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 41)-sequence over F3, using
(159−116, 159, 56)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (43, 159, 56)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (40, 159, 56)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 55)-sequence over F3, using
(159−116, 159, 137)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 159, 138)-net in base 3, because
- 34 times m-reduction [i] would yield (43, 125, 138)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3125, 138, S3, 82), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2 604298 500822 942421 007731 043738 827010 505663 123983 033715 065100 424407 / 4 505323 > 3125 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(3125, 138, S3, 82), but