Best Known (184, 184+12, s)-Nets in Base 3
(184, 184+12, 5592446)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (184, 196, 5592446)-net over F3, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 16, 46)-net over F3, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(316, 46, F3, 6, 6) (dual of [(46, 6), 260, 7]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(316, 46, F3, 5, 6) (dual of [(46, 5), 214, 7]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(33, 4, F3, 5, 3) (dual of [(4, 5), 17, 4]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(5;17,3) [i]
- linear OOA(313, 42, F3, 5, 6) (dual of [(42, 5), 197, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (7, 13, 42)-net over F3, using
- linear OOA(33, 4, F3, 5, 3) (dual of [(4, 5), 17, 4]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(316, 46, F3, 5, 6) (dual of [(46, 5), 214, 7]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(316, 46, F3, 6, 6) (dual of [(46, 6), 260, 7]-NRT-code), using
- digital (168, 180, 5592400)-net over F3, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (78, 90, 2796200)-net over F9, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(990, 2796200, F9, 14, 12) (dual of [(2796200, 14), 39146710, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(990, 8388601, F9, 2, 12) (dual of [(8388601, 2), 16777112, 13]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(990, 8388602, F9, 2, 12) (dual of [(8388602, 2), 16777114, 13]-NRT-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(8145, 4194301, F81, 2, 12) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388557, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(8145, 8388602, F81, 12) (dual of [8388602, 8388557, 13]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8145, large, F81, 12) (dual of [large, large−45, 13]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 21523360 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,11], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 13 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8145, large, F81, 12) (dual of [large, large−45, 13]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(8145, 8388602, F81, 12) (dual of [8388602, 8388557, 13]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OOA(8145, 4194301, F81, 2, 12) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388557, 13]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(990, 8388602, F9, 2, 12) (dual of [(8388602, 2), 16777114, 13]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 3-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(990, 8388601, F9, 2, 12) (dual of [(8388601, 2), 16777112, 13]-NRT-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(990, 2796200, F9, 14, 12) (dual of [(2796200, 14), 39146710, 13]-NRT-code), using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (78, 90, 2796200)-net over F9, using
- digital (10, 16, 46)-net over F3, using
(184, 184+12, large)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (184, 196, large)-net over F3, using
- 35 times duplication [i] based on digital (179, 191, large)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (175, 191, large)-net over F3, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3191, large, F3, 16) (dual of [large, large−191, 17]-code), using
- 40 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3151, large, F3, 16) (dual of [large, large−151, 17]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 14348906 = 315−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- 40 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(3151, large, F3, 16) (dual of [large, large−151, 17]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(3191, large, F3, 16) (dual of [large, large−191, 17]-code), using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (175, 191, large)-net over F3, using
(184, 184+12, large)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (184, 196, large)-net in base 3, because
- 10 times m-reduction [i] would yield (184, 186, large)-net in base 3, but