Best Known (161−133, 161, s)-Nets in Base 3
(161−133, 161, 37)-Net over F3 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 161, 37)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 161, 37)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26, N(F) = 36, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 36, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 36)-sequence over F3, using
(161−133, 161, 39)-Net over F3 — Digital
Digital (28, 161, 39)-net over F3, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (27, 161, 39)-net over F3, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 38)-sequence over F3, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F3 with g(F) = 27 and N(F) ≥ 39, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (27, 38)-sequence over F3, using
(161−133, 161, 72)-Net in Base 3 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 161, 73)-net in base 3, because
- 19 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 142, 73)-net in base 3, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3142, 73, S3, 2, 114), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 6597 874218 733402 809356 804076 642052 639813 649252 491630 534427 156747 493453 / 115 > 3142 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(3142, 73, S3, 2, 114), but